|
Scheduling Specifications:
What possible items should
your specifications address?
The CPM schedule is the
mutually-agreed construction plan which demonstrates to the owner that
the contractor has thought through all elements of the construction
process, has conformed to the requirements of the contract, and can
execute (and in updates, is executing) the activities within the
contractual time frames. It is also a tool for communication,
re-evaluation, recovery and adjudication of disputes. To assure the CPM
schedule is providing maximum benefit to all parties, owners should
consider to what degree they wish to specify how the contractor will
handle the CPM schedule. A checklist for what the owner might include in
the CPM Scheduling Specification is as follows:
-
Initial
submittal of the as-planned CPM schedule
-
Consider
a mobilization payment contingent upon submission of the initial
as-planned CPM schedule
-
On
longer projects consider requiring an initial 90-day CPM schedule,
then by the end of those 90 days require submittal of the CPM
schedule for the full project
-
Format
-
Specify
a "CPM Schedule" and not just a bar chart
-
Software
-
Some
owners specify the brand and version of software to be used
-
Public
owners should check with counsel regarding permissibility of a
"proprietary" specification
-
Hardware
-
Some
owners specify the computer hardware to be used
-
Some
owners specify that the hardware/software will be onsite
-
-
Coding
structure and activity group scheme
-
WBS
("work breakdown structure") coding structure
-
E.g.
"identify each activity by the following coding
structure"
-
Submittals
-
Procurement
and fabrication
-
Delivery
-
Construction
and installation
-
Testing
-
Change
orders
-
Delays
-
Some
owners may want to be able to see the schedule output organized by
-
Area,
building, etc.
-
Phase
-
General
type of activity, such as:
-
Site
work
-
Underground
-
Structure
-
Finish
trades
-
Minimum/Maximum
number of activities
-
Intended
to influence the level of detail in the contractor’s planning
-
Avoid
unrealistically large, unwieldy schedules with thousands of
activities
-
Minimum/Maximum
durations of activities
-
E.g.
"not more than 20% of the activities will be shorter than two
weeks or longer than three weeks"
-
Exclude
submittal, fabrication and delivery
-
May
include prohibitions against sequestering of float, e.g. by
artificially extending activity durations
-
Logic
issues - Some owners include specifications restricting the
likelihood of "games"
-
E.g.
prohibitions against redundant logic
-
E.g.
prohibitions against preferential logic (clever sequences of
activities, not in the most logical manner, but in a manner to
create the maximum possible opportunity for owner interference)
-
Constraints
-
Does
the contract include certain phases or construction sequences
which must be adhered to in order to avoid disrupting the owner’s
ongoing operations?
-
Such
constraints must be pre-identified by owner/designer and clearly
listed in bidding documents
-
Mandate
that these constraints must appear in the Initial As-planned CPM
schedule
-
Milestone
dates
-
Interfaces
with multiple primes
-
E.g.
"the headworks portion of the project must be operational
no later than 7/1/2004"
-
Submittals
to be included
-
Each
submittal to be shown as two activities
-
Contractor’s
submission of the submittal
-
Owner/Designer’s
review of the submittal
-
Per
requirements of the general or special conditions
-
Usually
14, 21 or 30 days (specify "calendar days" or
"working days")
-
All
tied logically to the activities they impact
-
Often
the next activity is "fabrication"
-
Owner-furnished
items to be included
-
E.g.
"Deliveries of owner furnished equipment or materials shall
be shown on the schedule with the dates set forth in the contract
documents or provide by the Construction Manager"
-
Assures
proper coordination and a realistic schedule
-
Start-up
and testing activities
-
Require
that contractual start-up and testing activities and realistic
durations be included in the CPM schedule
-
Updating
frequency
-
At
least monthly
-
Should
the update be tied to payment?
-
Starving
the contractor may result in collateral damage harmful to the
owner and subcontractors
-
Consider
targeted LD’s sufficient to permit the owner to hire an
outside consultant to perform the scheduling functions being
abandoned by the contractor
-
Updating
methodology
-
Some
owners may want to specify that the schedule update information be
collected by one or more of the following:
-
General
contractor daily reports
-
Subcontractor
daily reports
-
Inspectors’
daily reports or special activity update reports
-
Special
monthly report of the general contractor’s project manager
-
The
scheduler’s onsite inspection of work in place
-
Progress
reports presented in weekly scheduling meetings which include
major subcontractors
-
Specify
what reports must be included in schedule updates, including
-
Narrative
of all changes made in the schedule and the reasons for those
changes
-
Electronic
copy of the updated CPM schedule file
-
Note:
the owner can then run "Digger" or other software to
compare changes made from the previous electronic file
-
Consider
requiring a monthly scheduling update meeting including general
contractor, major subcontractors (e.g. those whose contracts
comprise 5% or more of the project budget, or as defined in the
contract), owner, construction manager, lead designer. Such joint
meetings:
-
Enhance
communication between the parties
-
Help
avoid surprises
-
Utilizes
the subcontractors as "tripwires" to detect games
being played with the schedule
-
Require
that all approved change orders be incorporated into the CPM
schedule as separate activities, linked logically to the
activities which are predecessors and successors
-
If
approval of change orders is a very time-consuming, bureaucratic
process, consider modifying the requirement that the change
order be "approved", so that each update realistically
reflects changes which are occurring
-
Updating
format
-
E.g.
types of reports
-
E.g.
electronic vs. printed or both
-
Scheduler’s
qualifications
-
Minimum
training and experience on projects of this type
-
On
very large projects: Should you require a full-time scheduler
onsite?
-
Some
owners utilize a "recorder of the schedule" – an
owner-controlled scheduler
-
Contractor
creates the initial as-planned CPM schedule
-
Upon
approval, baseline is transferred to owner-controlled computer
& scheduler
-
Contractor
submits continuing updates which are reviewed by the owner’s
representative
-
Loading
-
Cost
loading
-
Manpower
loading
-
Equipment
loading, where equipment is crucial to the pace of the work
-
Definitions
– the following should be defined in the scheduling specs or
elsewhere in the contract documents
-
Float
-
E.g.
"The contractor’s construction schedule shall begin with
the date of issuance of Notice to Proceed and conclude with the
date of final completion of the project. Float is a jointly
owned, expiring project resource available to both parties as
needed to meet contract milestones and the project completion
date."
-
Substantial
completion
-
Generally
substantial completion occurs when the project could be utilized
by the owner – but prior to completion of punch work and/or
warranty work
-
If
substantial completion is defined as "beneficial
occupancy" or "upon owner’s acceptance" this
could lead to unfair, potentially capricious actions by the
owner
-
Do
start-up and testing need to occur before substantial
completion?
-
Special
conditions or general conditions provisions
-
Limited
form of "No Damages for Delay"
-
E.g.
"Pursuant to the contract’s float sharing requirements,
no time extensions will be granted nor delay damages paid until
a delay occurs which impacts the project’s critical path,
consumes all available float or contingency time available and
extends the work beyond the contract completion date."
-
Early
completion - Define in advance the consequences of the contractor’s
submission of an early completion CPM schedule
-
E.g.
"In the event of the contractor’s submission of a CPM
schedule which shows project completion more than 30 days prior
to the contractual completion date of _________________, at the
owner’s sole option, either (a) the contractual completion
date shall be redefined to be equal to the contractor’s
projected completion date shown in the CPM schedule or (b) the
difference in days between the contractor’s projected
completion date and the contractual completion date shall become
the duration of a new activity described as "Project
Float" which shall be the immediate predecessor to the
final completion milestone in the contractor’s CPM
schedule."
-
Involvement
of subcontractors in the scheduling process
-
E.g.
insert a contract requirement that major subs participate in and
sign off on baseline and updates
-
E.g.
require that major subcontractors attend a weekly (or bi-monthly)
scheduling meeting with general contractor and owner and possibly
the designer
-
Procedures
for justification of time extension analyses
-
May
include requirement that contractor submit fragnet analysis of
each delay for which a time extension is requested
-
May
require that contractor demonstrate that mitigation of delays is
not possible by other means, such as acceleration, stacking of
trades, etc.
-
Remedies
for non-compliance
-
Owners
are encouraged to find remedies which do not cause collateral
damage to subcontractors, suppliers and owners, e.g. instead of
withholding all payments until compliance is achieved, consider
imposing targeted LDs which free up funds for the owner to
outsource the scheduling activity (also see above, #12.b.)
-
How
to represent delays in the CPM schedule
-
Weather
delays
-
When
and how to input them
-
Use
of suspend-resume
-
Include
language requiring the contractor to "anticipate normal
inclement weather delays" (e.g. 10-year average number of
rain days in each month)
-
Other
excusable delays
-
Useful
in developing recovery schedules
-
Discuss
at weekly scheduling meetings between owner-contractor-major
subcontractors-designer
|